Diversity League Table 2014 – Results, Launch event and publication release
Last night (29th October) saw the release of the BSN 2014 Diversity League Table report. The launch event was attended by over 140 people and hosted by Norton Rose Fulbright at their London offices.
The Law Society is the lead sponsor of the Diversity League Table initiative and this year it was also supported by over 50 firms and chambers. Law Society president Andrew Caplen said in this year’s report, “The league tables are widely considered to be one of the profession’s leading diversity reports…”
The Government’s Minister for Women and Equalities, the Rt Hon Nicky Morgan MP, said, also in this year’s publication, “Transparency in companies goes a long way to solving the problem of diversity.”
In a statement of support, Lady Hale, Deputy President of The Supreme Court, said:“Congratulations to the Black Solicitors Network, and all those involved in the compilation of the latest Diversity League Tables. I hope that the wealth of data found within it will encourage and help to feed discussions and action at all levels of firms and chambers about the part each of us can play in helping achieve a more diverse legal profession.”
The Overall Diversity League Table is made up by a combination of a participants’ position in the “Policy & Practice” table and the “Demographic League Table”.
Matthew Arnold & Baldwin were overall top, which is the same as in 2013. O’Melveny & Myers LLP were second, again the same as 2013. Weightmans LLP entered the top 10 at third spot
Laura Seaman, Corporate Responsibility Partner at Matthew Arnold & Baldwin said,“Diversity is a core value of ours. We want the best people so must attract and retain people from a wide range of backgrounds and experiences.”
For chambers, first and second place went to Matrix and Coram chambers respectively. Third place went to One Crown Office Row who moved up one place from last year.
Rhodri Thompson QC, Chair of the Management Committee at Matrix Chambers said, “Matrix actively seeks to retain its diverse talent by promoting equality of opportunity and not becoming complacent.”
Alison Easton, member of Coram’s Executive Board said, “At a time that the judiciary and Bar are facing continued scrutiny for the lack of progress on diversity, we are proud that our commitment to put diversity at the heart of our Chambers has once again been acknowledged.” Said added, “Coram continues its work in nurturing the promotion of female and EM candidates to senior judicial appointments.”
Looking at the Demographic League Tables, which are based only on the demographic make-up of the participating organisation, new entrant Fasken Martineau LLP came top, with O’Melveny & Myers LLP and Matthew Arnold & Baldwin second and third respectively.
For chambers, 25 Bedford Row came first in the Demographic League Table for chambers, with Five Paper and Red Lion Chambers taking second and third spots respectively.
Kim Hollis QC said, “In keeping with 25 Bedford Row long established and continuing policy in diversity we are proud to have received the rating as first in the overall demographic table.”
Withers came top of the ranking for Female Partners, followed by Slater and Gordon (UK) and Winckworth Sherwood in second and third place respectively.
Suzanne Todd, partner and head of Withers’ Women’s Networking Group commented, “With nearly 45% of our London Partners being female and 50% of our global offices headed by women, we are not short of high profile female role models and it is fantastic to see that we lead the league table in this regard.”
Cleary Gottlieb topped the table for LGB (Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual) solicitors, followed very closely by Latham & Watkins and then Withers.
Cleary Gottlieb partner Maurits Dolmans said, “As a firm, we greatly value the perspectives of individuals from a variety of backgrounds, beliefs and life experiences, and this is reflected by the diversity of our people.”
To see all of the tables and rankings, go to page 117 (firms) and 137 (chambers) in the report, which can be accessed below.
- Only 12% of QCs and 27% of partners are women, despite the fact that 44% of pupils and 62% of trainees are also women.
- Only 5.5% of QCs and 8% of partners are from an ethnic minority background, despite 20.5% of pupils and 23% of trainees being from an ethnic minority background.
- The situation of Black lawyers and barristers (as opposed to EM): this group make up only 0.5% of partners and 1% of QCs.
- International firms and the six City 10 firms in our sample tend to have achieved greater levels of ethnic diversity, when compared with their relative lack of gender diversity.
- UK Top 100 firms at the top of our table tend to be there because of enhanced levels of gender diversity.
- The number of firms taking part remained fairly constant, dropping by only one; from 42 in 2013 to 41 in 2014.
- The number of participating chambers dropped dramatically from 29 in 2013 to just 16 in 2014. It was also observed that nearly all of that was due to almost no chambers outside of London volunteering to provide data on the demographic make-up of their set.
- At trainee and associate level women tend to be slightly better represented outside of London. At partner level we are approaching parity, with women outside of London edging it.
- The figures for EM at trainee and associate level are not surprising, with London firms showing 22.5% of trainees compared to 11.4%. Interestingly, the difference is less stark at partner level.
The regional figures regarding EM Partners hint at a link with the two profile interviews featured in the wider DLT publication. We speak to George Lubega, a partner at Nabarro LLP and Harold Brako, partner and head of Shoosmiths’ Manchester office.
The Event: Diversity Discussion Panel
A summary of the findings were presented by head researcher Professor Peter Urwin, followed by a very lively diversity panel discussion and audience Q&A hosted by BBC national news presenter and journalist Clive Myrie. Alongside Professor Urwin on the panel were Annabel Smith of Morgan Stanley, Derek Tuitt of Hewlett Packard and the BSN’s Executive Director Cordella Bart-Stewart.
In his presentation Professor Urwin pointed out that attrition rates by gender and ethnicity were worryingly high. He told the audience that the key “exit point” for BME lawyers was at the stage between trainee and associate; whereas for women it was at the point between associate and partner.
The panel discussion ran with the retention and progression theme. Clive Myrie kicked things off brilliantly with a series of probing questions which enlivened both the panellists and the listening audience.
The audience came for a lively discussion and that’s exactly what they got. Myrie doggedly pressed for meaningful answers to difficult questions. Importantly the panel guests did not shirk their responsibility to the audience; resulting in a pulsating discussion, which then fed into an equally lively audience Q&A session to finish the evening.
The last question of the night came from Kim Hollis QC of 25 Bedford Row who simply asked of each panel member “Has the time come for quotas? And if not, why not?
Annabel Smith said, “I am pro-quota…” adding, “…but with the right level of accountability.”
Professor Urwin responded by saying that “Quotas across the board in private sector would be problematic to impose.”
And Cordella Bart-Stewart said that “It needs to be from the top down.” Adding, “It can’t be quotas just for the judiciary; it has to be for the whole profession.”
The print version of the Diversity League Table has a cover price of £45.00, but access to the online version is free. Please follow the link below to read the full report: